The South Carolina nullification crisis, under President Andrew Essay - 1

The South Carolina nullification crisis, under President Andrew Jackson, split the Democratic Party in two - Essay Example The Existential Fallacy is passed because there is no particular conclusion from two universal premises. This argument passes all six tests for validity. It passes the Equivocation Fallacy because there are only three terms used in the exact same way. It passes the Fallacy of the Undistributed Middle because the middle term is distributed in the second premise. It passes the Illicit Major and Illicit Minor Fallacies because the major term is distributed in the first premise and in the conclusion. The argument passes the Fallacy of Exclusive Premises because there are not two negative premises. It passes the Affirmative Conclusion from a Negative Premise Fallacy because the conclusion is negative. Finally, it passes the Existential Fallacy because there is no particular conclusion from two universal conclusions. This argument is valid based on the fact that it passes all six tests for validity. The Equivocation Fallacy is passed because there are only three terms used in the same way. The Fallacy of the Undistributed Middle Term is passes because the middle term is distributed in the first premise. The Fallacies of the Illicit Major or Illicit Minor are passed because any term distributed in the conclusion is distributed in the premises. ... No protective tariffss(d) could be nullifiedp(d). Mood, Figure, and Latin Name: EAE-2 Cesare Venn Diagram: This argument is valid based on the fact that it passes all six tests for validity. The Equivocation Fallacy is passed because there are only three terms used in the same way. The Fallacy of the Undistributed Middle Term is passes because the middle term is distributed in the first premise. The Fallacies of the Illicit Major or Illicit Minor are passed because any term distributed in the conclusion is distributed in the premises. It passes the Affirmative Conclusion from Negative Premises Fallacy because the conclusion is negative so there is no affirmative conclusion. The Existential Fallacy is passed because there is no particular conclusion from two universal premises. Third Argument: No nullifiersm(d) supported protective tariffsp(d). Some South Carolinianss(u) were nullifiersm(u). Some South Carolinianss(u) did not support protective tariffsp(d). Mood, Figure, and Latin Name: EIO-1 Ferio Venn Diagram: This argument is valid because it passes all six of the tests for validity. It passes the Equivocation Fallacy because there are only three terms used in the same sense. The Fallacy of the Undistributed Middle is passed because the middle term is distributed in the first premise. It passes the Fallacies of the Illicit Major and Illicit Minor because the major term is distributed in the conclusion and in the first premise. The Fallacy of Exclusive Premises is passed because there are not two negative premises. The Affirmative Conclusion from Negative Premises is passed because the conclusion is negative. It passes the Existential Fallacy because there is no particular conclusion from two